Points Of View

Points of View Aeschylus faces off with Euripides in a dramatic supervise and is decl ared the victor. The decision is matchless of cosmetics more than(prenominal) than substance. Aeschylus wrote plays that appealed to the quite a pocketable of Athens. The Oresteia is a bilgewater with hefty character references faced with t in all(prenominal) decisions in which rightness prevails. On the other hand, Euripides wrote plays that were more realistic, such(prenominal) as The Electra, which reveals the helplessness of hands and women. That twain authors wrote plays dealing with the akin story helps us to complete the differences in their faiths and styles. The Oresteia plausibly was favoured more by the Athenian people because of some key situationors. wiz of these is character portrayal. Aeschylus make his heroes strong minded and serious of resolve, whereas Euripides t ceaseed to bear witness his characters short attacks. An example of this is the character of Orestes. In The Libation Bearers, Orestes comes upon the picture and makes himself cognise to his babe immediately and right past reveals his plot to kill their tiros eat upers. He is in control of the attendant and prepared to kill both his begin and her lover: Our crabbedness who is never starved for fall shall drink/ for the third pickup a cupful of unwatered origination (Libation Bearers, Lines 577-578). Orestes would contribute appealed to the Athenian adult malekind because of his strength and his desire to retaliate the murder of his make and finish up the oracle of Apollo. In The Electra, Euripides creates a real different appetite for Orestes than does Aeschylus. Orestes does non burst onto the snapshot and immediately make himself cognize to his babe. He actu accessory does not volitioningly reveal himself. It is not until his aged tutor comes and recognises him that he admits to Electra that he is her brother. This must(prenominal)(prenominal) have distressed an Athenian auditory sense to rede the son of Agamemnon secrecy his individuality from his sister for quite a long folder of dialogue. When his identity is know, it must have been genuinely disheartening to try out the occasion Greek leaders son cosmos so indecisive. Orestes cannot wait to theorize or act for himself: Whom shall I make/ my ally? Shall I act by shadow or by mean solar day? What path shall I/ bear off once against my foes? (Electra, Lines 599-601). Oresetes weak will shows itself again when he sees his mother coming and cries out: Orestes: persuade! We must revise our plan./ Electra: What is it? Do you see reinforcements from Mycenae?/ Orestes: No, but the mother, the char that gave me/ present (Electra, Lines 963-967). Orestes reluctantly slays his mother hardly after a dandy deal of pushing by his anxious sister. This scene is real different from Aeschylus, where Orestes needs no such spurring from his sister to avenge their tyros murder. Electra is another character that probably did not pass on Euripides all votes from his audience. In The Oresteia, Electra lives in the same dwelling shack as her mother and holds the shameful touch of a kings little girl hitherto though her father is dead. In Euripedes fluctuation of the story, Electra was consider out from the lofty house, marries a fry, and is dressed in the rags of poverty. Also, she complains forever and a day about her low status. all told by means ofout the commencement ceremony pages she tells the audience of her woes, raising questions as to her motives for having her brother return and her mother killed. This is close obvious in the conversation with her brother, his identity so far concealed, in which she must say out of her grievous fortunes to Orestes. Interestingly, the murder of her father ranks behind the conjure up of her clothes, the hovel in which she lives, the locomote she must do (even though the man she marries offered to do it all for her), the particular that she can not affableize at the holy festivals, and the item that her mother is queen. These selfish complaints are very(prenominal) different from the Electra of The Oresteia who speaks of her father first and also of the powers of Force, and Right,/ and genus Zeus almighty (The Libation Bearers, Lines 244-245). A mo area in which Aeschylus probably won the favour of the estimate is the end scenes of Clytemnestra and Aegisthus and the events follo go ong their deaths. In The Oresteia, Orestes confronts both Clytemnestra and Aegisthus individually and kills them. Then, in The Eumenides, the play is devoted to decision making whether the matricide committed by Orestes is justified. The annunciation of this play is the recognition of the Furies as justice of an older time, and genus genus Athene assigns them their rightful place in modern justice. Euripides treats the deaths of Clytemnestra and Aegisthus very differently. First, Euripides gives a detailed description of the death of Aegisthus, which at the time was not a popular involvement with the audience. The way Orestes stabbed Aegisthus in the concealment probably did not win each point from the decide either. Then, after Orestes slays his mother, the mood is very different from that of The Oresteia.

Orestes and Electra both trance that what they did was not justified even by the oracle of Apollo and lament their actions. This is quite different from the portly Orestes of The Oresteia. Euripides even dares to blame it on Apollo: Castor: Clever he is, but what he required of/ you was not clever (Electra, Lines 1243-1244). The polish of the play is very savage and does not give much detail about the futurity for Orestes or Electra. The play leaves the proofreader questioning if justice genuinely was served. Aeschylus would win the contest in Athens because Athenians would call for to position more with his play. Aeschylus provides for the audience a play of heroic actions, baronial characters, and the development of justice, which is a very pleasing image for Athenians. Euripides, on the other hand, questions the nobility of riches and the actions of his heroic characters. Also, Euripides writes some daring, less-traveled things in his plays, such as the scene in The trojan horse Women when Athena asks Poseidon to help her punish the Greeks by causing a giant storm on their voyage home. I take Euripides is cave in suited to ransom Athens from moral end because of the underlying values in his plays. In The Electra, Euripides uses the character of the mutter to show that wealth does not mean strength of character. The idyl shows that even a misfortunate man can be frightful and honourable, and in my opinion is more honourable than any of the other characters who are considered noble because of their royal lineage. Euripides plays contain more realism than Aeschylus plays, and I recall they give better perspicacity into the moral problems of the common man than does a play that has characters that seem more mythical than real. The impartiality can sometimes be ugly, and Euripides tries to convey reality in its raw form through and through his plays. He also helps to give insights on some remedies for brotherly problems. The Trojan Women is a strong example of how Euripides shows the audience the fantasm of war through the eye of Hecuba, coming at a time when Athens is preparing a military campaign in Syracuse. Euripides focuses on moral and sociable issues far more than Aeschylus does and that is wherefore he would be better suited to save Athens. If you trust to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper