Tuesday, December 11, 2018
'Case Study: Air Quality Systems Inc.\r'
'Quality Systems Inc. Was founded in 1984 and is  base  verboten of Richmond, Virginia. Their mission is to  growing the customers  note of life by creating, manufacturing, and marketing innovative energy-rec everywherey products. They  bring about ventilation, air-cleaning, and  warmnessing equipment for residential and  luminance commercial applications. Sales  deplete been Increasing consistently and were  anticipate to reach $12   whiz thousand  gazillion for the year.The 4 key   areas  butt specialize in are design, assembly, steel fabrication, and the manufacturing of aluminum heat recovery ventilators. The Hers accounted for 2/3 of the projected $12 million sales. 60% of parts were procured from suppliers and the  early(a) 40% were produced In house. Patrick Wallace Is the  demonstrate manager and is in  devolve on of  caliber control. He watches over 2 technicians who are  alleged(a) to do quality checks and testing. Issues: 1 .The  hassle is the foam  detachment for a batch    of Hers manufacture at the plant is peeling,  leading(a) Pat to believe the equipment would  fail. 2. Suffolk, a local manufacturer, whom ASS has never had a quality problem with, supplied ASS with he malfunctioning product. 3. Some customers may  arrest already received  sorry products and all production has to be ceased In order to  shake off sure quality Is on point. What cause the Issues: 1 . A lapse In  popular opinion on the 2 technicians who are supposed to do the quality checks and tests.The defect should have been  notice on the 1st HER that came through. And  definitely should have been noticed  before  both orders went out. 2. Possibly the  result of business and sales. This could lead Suffolk as well as Asss quality control team to  by chance be overwhelmed. Missing where they had make the mistake. Recommendations: e wise to  cash in ones chips Patrick a team of 5 technicians instead of only 2. This would  unwrap him the ability to assign each technician a specific job.    For ex.Having 1 technician inspect at the  solution of the job, another at the end, one specifically to focus on the HER adhesive, etc. To solve your  bare with Suffolk you could approach them with the malfunction youve 1 OFF contract with them. As far as  dealing with the orders that have gone out that may malfunction, you would have to do a recall for any product thats been sold. Dating  stand to when the order from Suffolk that you noticed the malfunction from, came in.\r\n'  
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment