Public v. Private Life Essay

In Milan Kunderas book, Testaments Betrayed, he contends that multitude act very differently when they be in public comp atomic number 18d to their clubby lives. Milan appropriately emphasizes the need for musical interval between ones public and private vivification, and asserts that the real criminals be the ones who attempt to break that boundary. Logically, people will say and do things when they argon alone that would be beyond the realm of appropriate behavior when they are in public. Therefore, I agree with Kunderas claim that the curtain between these two gentlemans gentlemans should not be tampered with and that the curtain-rippers are the actual offenders.There are many times where national chaos and embarrassment has been created through people tamper in the private lives of other people. For example, the paparazzi are constantly arduous to expose the personal experiences of countless celebrities. Recently they succeeded with the infiltration of the universal p icture-messaging application, Snapchat, as well as Apples coveted web-based storage facility, the iCloud. These hackers were equal to(p) to obtain numerous explicit photographs of renowned actresses, including Jennifer Lawrence and Victoria Justice, and distri notwithstandinge them for the world to see. This is extremely embarrassing to those women and, much to their chagrin, those pictures meant for somebody close and important to them are now being hungrily consumed by the eyes of some 12-year octogenarian kid on their laptop.Since this barrier between private and personal life was broken by meddlers, these celebrities are now viewed as indecent, and discombobulate preoccupied much of the admiration they had before the incident. How could the exposure of ones private life to the entire world possibly be considered just? These ladies did nought wrong, yet they are harshly criticized for their actions because somebody wanted to interfere in their private lives. This incident cl early demonstrates that the insatiable paparazzi, not the innocent celebrities, are the true criminals here.Our nations history also holds many instances of interferers meddling in the private lives of our elected officials. One such example would be Bill Clintons affair with Monica Lewinsky. Yes, he did cheat on his wife, but was it really fair to let the entire world know that he did that? When the government was informed about the situation, the presidents unfortunate plight was broadcast to the entire nation. The situation escalated to the point of unjustified impeachment hearings, but as luck would have it Clinton was acquitted by the Senate.Clinton nearly lost his beloved wife and his romp because his private life was exposed by those who had no right to be sticking their noses into his personal affairs. The peeping Toms that yanked open the curtain between Clintons actions fender and his affairs in the publics spotlight completely ruin Clintons life. If these felons h adnt intruded, Clinton would have been spared a world full of pity and embarrassment. Therefore, it is indisputable that the ones truly at fault are the criminals who exposed Clinton, because his lives, both private and public, were devastated by their irresponsible actions.In summary, past invasions of privacy have shown that many negative effects may result from such blizzard and unprovoked actions. It is therefore only just and proper that the steel erode between ones private and public lives remain forevermore and eternally sealed.