Comparing Machiavellis Prince and Martha Stuart :: Comparison Compare Contrast Essays

Machiavellis Prince and Martha Stuart I recollect Machiavellis advice in The Prince was ideal for the rulers in 16th century Italy, because Machiavelli understood the indigence of most political men. Machiavelli based his theories on perfect examples throughout History. Machiavelli reverently believed his advice was essential for the uniting of Italy which was his principal desire. Machiavelli states that in an ideal world, it is virtuous for a prince to be good. But in reality, princes who distance themselves from ethical concerns and do whatever it takes for the benefit of their states rule best. Therefore, it is better to be frugal than generous, cruel than loving, subtle than honest. Machiavellis general rule is to be as good as raft allow, but be willing to resort to any means infallible for the good of the state. A prince must be willing to resort to roughshod if that is what it takes to overcome the change in fortune. Proper cruelty is done at one time a nd serves a specific purpose. Improper cruelty is exigent and threatening to the citizens. A wise to(p) prince must be willing to suffice proper cruelty in order to maintain power, but stave off improper cruelty so that his subjects do not feel nuisance for him. Machiavelli emphasizes the need for the prince to win the support of the people. A feudal prince must be wise in controlling the nobles and keeping the people content. A wise prince must not put off confrontations for another day. Even fortresses argon useless if the prince does not shed the support of his people. Machiavelli makes it clear hypocrisy and lie are legitimate methods in politics. It is not important for a prince to have good qualities only appear to have them. The prince must have the characteristics of twain the fox and the lion. The fox can neck snares but cannot drive external the enemy while the lion can protect themselves but cannot recognize snares. In deduction, the prince must be cunning and courageous. For Machiavelli, the wellbeing of the state has no ethical or moral implications. Anything that benefits the state is considered superior. Machiavelli considers the appearance of being unearthly as the most powerful quality.