“Old Man and the Sea” book report Essay

I decided to read this handwriting for two reasons. My friends have read this support in the past and said it wasnt too bad. Second, it is one heck of a short book. I finished this book in 2 days. As the sample book report says, this book is only 27,000 words long. The book lived up to what my friends had said ab appear it. The book was one of the best authoritative stories I have read, it had a good story and good description. Hemingway could pigment the pictures in my mind. I have read other shot stories of his, masking in eighth grade, but they pale in comparison to this masterpiece of writing.The story was about and superannuated man (re totallyy? ) who is a fisherman. He goes out every day to go fishing, but he has no destiny for about 80 days. But one day, he goes out entirely and hooks a humongeous whale size marlin. He cant bring it in because it is too heroic. He has to wait until it gets tired so he can harpoon it. He goes 2 days contend the fish, without food or rest. until he finally gets his chance. But when he thinks it is all over, there is still more trouble ahead. The fish is too spectacular to be placed in his small boat, so he has to welt it to the side.Meanwhile, the blood from the harpoon shot leaks out into the sea and attracts sharks. While the old man is returning radix from his expedition, he has to fight off the sharks from feeding his prize. But it doesnt take to long for the sharks to take lots of big chunks out of the fish. He ends up killing all the sharks and he gets home safely, and exhausted. Ernest Hemingway is an author of the past. Compared to a more modern author, like say, John Grisham, he has disagreeent and unique qualities. Hemingway likes to use lots of descriptive phrases, while going away little room for actual character discussion.Grisham, on the other hand, makes for certain that there is a lot of character dialog throughout his stories. Hemingway doesnt really have a set climax of his story, while G risham has a definite peak to his books. This tho goes to show you how book writing styles differ through the years. I didnt find any flaws or things in the book that I had a problem believing or comprehending. You just have to read a book and take it how it is. I slangt really see a need to critique such a great book. In conclusion, this book is one of favorite classics, and I would recommend this to a friend because of its great story, descriptions, and length.