Violence in America: Guns under Fire Essay

Guns ar mapd for encourageion against mayhem when the unexpected happens. As the citizens of the United give ins of the States, the amendments be there to protect the freedom of the the great unwashed. The second amendment protects the properly of each individual to keep, and bear arms, and to defend our property, and most importantly ourselves. In James Q. Wilsons New York Times article, secure Take a mode(p) Their Guns, Wilson argues that restraining citizenry from de jure purchasing firearms do non have some(prenominal) effect on the il intelligent expend of throttles, and reducing the sum of m nonpareily of mountain who are illegally covering one. He adequately reasons how the eradication of illegal guns on the streets should be the chief(prenominal) focus regarding toughening American gun authorization regulations, which are the most frequently debated topic in America. Wilson shoots that frisks and stops will rule in illegal guns, and non multiplying the forms one fills to leverage a gun. James Q. Wilson targeted legally gun owners as his consultation, uses logos and ethos to his rhetorical approach, and an stiff, but could have had an general stronger argument. virtue changeless(prenominal) citizens such as legally gun owners are the intended audience in his topic, because of the, legal restraints on the lawful purchase of guns (p.124). To eliminate illegal use of guns there must a via media between the establishment, and the citizens of rightfully legal gun owners. Toughening gun control law will have teeny effect on the illegal use of guns, which essentially decrease the amount of citizens buying guns. Wilson rents that roughly 200 gazillion guns are owned by law abiding citizens, although, these guns are not the ones that are generally employ for illegal and unlawful acts. Illegal uses of guns are usually obtainable with stolen, borrowed, or privately purchased that are utilise for gang related activities, burglari es, and or violent crimes. Wilson thusly makes a catch that an increase in gun control regulations would take a stupendous hit on none other than those law abiding citizens.The main purpose of owning these guns is for self-defense and to protect their loved ones, and properties. Collins Professor of watchfulness and Public Policy at the University of California, James Q Wilson noted that, Many cities nurture from a shortage of officeholders is the exact reason why the citizens of the United States of America cannot reply on the government officials, such as the law enforcement to protectthe hoi polloi, and their properties (p.125). Even if the gun control legislation successfully reduce the amount of lawful citizens to own guns. How will the government reduce the amount of people who are illegally owning guns in the present as well as the future? Wilson extractd in his story that, The average constabulary officer will make no weapons arrests and confiscate no guns during any effrontery yearWhich will result in much illegal guns come out on the streets than the law abiding citizens with registered guns (p.125). That will definitely strikes fear into the peoples mind knowing they cant protect themselves, and quite frankly, not enough law of nature officers to protect each, and every individual people in America at any given point of time. Law abiding guns owners are the intended target audience because Wilsons claim is legal restraints on the lawful purchase of guns will have little effect on the illegal use of guns (p.124).James Q. Wilson strengthens his argument through the use ethos and logos to elaborate and emphasizes his thesis and claims of Our goal should not be the disarming of law-abiding citizens. It should be to reduce the number of people who stretch out guns unlawfully, especially in places- on streets, in taverns- . . . (p.124). The use of ethos helps Wilson to reinforce his claims and establishes credibleness in his study by using the twenty-five percent amendment of the constitution, Mark Moore, who is a professor of earthly concern insurance policy at Harvard University, Gary Kleck, who is a criminologist at Florida State University, and The National Rifle Association to back up his argument. The use of ethos is effective in this essay for this topic, because the topic requires valid examples, masterys, and statistics to anchor Wilsons claims of gun control legislation, and the reduction of illegal guns on the streets. James Q. Wilson points out The fourth Amendment to the constitution bans unreasonable searches and seizure.(p.125).The amendment caused, ample law-enforcement personnel worry about having their cases impel out for constitutional reasons or being accused of police torture which results in shortage of police officers throughout cities in America (p.125). Harvard University is one of the top colleges in America, and with Mark Moore, a professor of public policy at Harvard University stated, found that most weapons arrests were do because of a citizen complained, not because the police were outlooking for gun.(p.125). Wilson uses a professor from Harvard University is an exponential clever way of supporting his claim for the gun control legislation, and making his argument heretofore more effective. Gary Kleck is a credible guy, because of his career as a criminologist at Florida State University, and he, has estimated that every year, guns are used- that is, displayed or fired- for defensive purposes more than a million times, not counting their use by the police(p.124).This statement by Gary Kleck supported Wilsons examples of guns that are used to defend ourselves, and our properties, and as well as the law enforcement usage of guns to protect the country. Finally, Wilson uses a credit from The National Rifle Association and its allies that, guns dont buck people, people kill people to emphasize the importance of, urge the government to punish more sever ely people who use guns to commit crimes sooner of worrying too much about how to ban guns from law abiding citizens (p.126).James Q. Wilson uses logos for logical argument about gun control legislation, and its restraint on guns purchase that fails to have great effect on the illegal use of guns. Most people would argued that less guns mean less violence, but what they dont know is that most crimes committed by guns are illegal that was stolen, borrowed, or bought from the dark market. Wilson uses logos in his essay with organized structure along with a clear and concise thesis created an effective argument that is easily understood and followed by his target audience that generated a well- be after essay. Wilson backed up his argument by giving facts such as, In 1992 the police arrested about 240,000 people for illegally possessing or carry weapon. This is only about one-fourth as many as were arrested for public drunkenness (p.125).That number is considered low if it is divided by every state in America. Considering these illegal gun holders are protected under the fourth amendment of unreasonable searches and seizures, which most of them probably got away with. The reasonable suspicion exam is much less stringent than the probable cause standard the police must meet in order to make an arrest . . . more than just a hunch it must be supported with facts take on someone acting in a way that leads an experienced officer to conclude criminal activity . . . someone fleeing at the approach . . . a person who fits a drug courier profile a automobilist stopped for a trafficviolation who has a suspicious intumescency in his pocket . . . Supreme Court has also upheld frisking people on probation or parole (125). A criminal who know how to use the law to their advantage could potentially get away for their crimes and wrongdoings, and it puts the people in danger by knowing these illegal gun users might not go to jail, but set freed on parole and/or probation. Wi lson used logos to rationalize appeal to the reader by stating facts and statistics to prove his claim and blended it with ethos to establish credibility for his argument.James Q. Wilson effectively presents his argument in a persuasive approach that uses different techniques such as ethos, logos, and organization. Wilson makes his ideas diffused to follow by making the flow more sinuous which results in the contribution of the cohesiveness of his overall argument. The structure is clearly well planned and constructed that consisted of claims followed by statistics, counterclaims, and rebuttals. Even though Wilson made his argument effective, he reason out his counterclaim with frisks and stops made by police officers by patting down in the mouth individual that seems suspicious. Innocent people will be stopped. Young black and Hispanic men will probably be stopped more often than older while Anglo males or women of any race (p.127) However, When Wilson made this point he alludes to the idea of racial profiling, and he loses credibility by such reasoning.James Q. Wilson argument in this essay presents claims that were debatable in an informative way, and his thesis suggested solutions to the central problem regarding gun control legislation, and its legal restraints on lawful purchase of guns. Through the use of many techniques, Wilson created a well-organized and effective argument. However, had he addressed the issue of racial profiling with evidence, then he could have had an improved and sturdier effective argument.Works CitedWilson, James Q. Just Take Away Their Guns. Current Issues and Enduring Questions. By Sylvan Barnet and Hugo Bedau. 9th ed. capital of Massachusetts Bedford/St. Martins, 2011. 124-27. Print.