Anthropology Fossil Determination, Explanation, and Analysis

Anthropology 2- EXTRA CREDIT appointment\n\n commit 1:\nfogy 1 displays characteristics of Australopithecus aethiopicus of air jacket Lake Turkana, Kenya. This skull shows the obvious characteristics of a genuinely sharp sagittal spinning drop dead along the top of the skull, a very wide skull in the cheek ara, and an utmost(prenominal)ly prognathous rase skull and jaw area. The cranial capacity also appears to be scummy, suggesting that it is of the earlier hominids.\n\nFossil 2 shows eyebrow ridges and a urbane sagittal jacket crown invariable with gay erectus. The almost be characteristic, however, is the presence of nuchal torus, a bump of swot up at the moxie of the skull where muscles are attached to take in the head up, suggesting a systematically bipedal creature.\n\nFossil 3 is a small skull present tense no sagittal crest or nuchal torus. There are eyebrow ridges apparent and the buttock is subtlely prognathic. The skull most fast resembles the sk ull equal that of the Taung child (Jurmain 203). The skull of the Taung child, a variety known as the gracile australopithecine, or A. africanus, exhibits littler brain capacity, accounting for the smaller skull.\n\nThe fourth fossil has a small skull be conveys the characteristics of human beings sapien, therefore may be a child. At the top of the skull, the bone has not to the full come together, consistent with children, and very young human sapien. The odontiasis are very small but are shovel-shaped like modern human beings teeth, adapted to tear and call on the carpet softer foods than those e ingestn by earlier homosexual and other hominids. The skull shows little to no prognathism consistent with humans.\n\nSTATION 2:\nFossil 1 at this station showed postorbital constriction, excess bone behind the eyebrows protecting the eyes. The skull showed slight prognathism, which is the protrusion of the jaw and lower skull. I predicted that the skull was Homo erectus; however, I noted that the African form, Homo ergaster, characteristically shows postorbital constriction whereas Homo erectus does not.\n\nFossil 2 showed less(prenominal) prognathism, a skull more closely resembling modern Homo. However, the brow ridges present were more pronounced that in modern Homo. The small shovel-shaped teeth also are articulation of an early Homo sapien because they ate more cooked vegetation and meat, their teeth were used less for the scrape of hard, brittle vegetation. The fossil most closely displays the characteristics of Cro-Magnon, or Homo sapiens sapiens (Jurmain 281).\n\nSTATION 3:\nThe first jowl is very robust and shows extreme molarization,...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:

Need assistance with such assignment as write my paper? Feel free to contact our highly qualified custom paper writers who are always eager to help you complete the task on time.